Hoi, You are correct :) Thanks, GerardM
On 24 February 2011 00:50, Casey Brown lists@caseybrown.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 06:55, Bishakha Datta bishakhadatta@gmail.com
wrote:
One thought occurred to me: there is no representation of Asian
languages in
the committee (and I don't mean only Indian languages). Would the
committee
want to consider an expansion in membership to include someone who is
fluent
in one or more Asian languages?
In principle yes, but... [1]
Linguistic qualifications for becoming a LangCom member are not so simple. After a couple of years in LangCom, I may say that many professors of linguistics don't fit. And the main reason is not their knowledge, but attitude toward languages. Or, to be more precise, their boldness. For example, LangCom tasks require from one Indo-Europeanist to give expertize on any Indo-European language, but many of them would say that the classification of, let's say, Kurdish languages is not the part of their job, but the part of the job of an expert in Iranian languages. Such expert in LangCom is basically useless.
Doesn't the language committee also actively seek out experts in different languages when they need to? I seem to recall you guys having all test wikis checked by a linguist/expert who speaks the language before they are created.
So it's not like people who speak Asian (or other similar) languages aren't being actively involved, it's just that none of them are in the "administrative committee" at this time. At least that's how I remember it being explained many threads ago. :-)
-- Casey Brown Cbrown1023
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l