Eric,
I am still puzzled. In your model below, I can only see the cycle
trustees->ed and trustees+ ed(+external experts) ->nominating committee -> trustees
Where is the community input?
Best, H.
- One possible model: a set of criteria for Board members, with an
expert Nominating Committee member charged with responsibility for evaluating candidates based on any one criterion. Criteria might include community values, wiki experience, managerial experience, financial skills, understanding of our legal context, collaborative nature, etc.
- The NC should recommend a completely new interim Board ASAP (it
could and probably should include existing Board members - but this would be up to the NC to decide, based on a serious skills evaluation).
- The interim Board would serve for a period of a year; at the end of
that period, the NC would recommend to renew terms or replace Board members. New Board members would have to come from the Advisory Board or the Community Council.