Thank you for bringing these questions together here. As you are aware the
questions and answers are also on meta (both the talk:Endowment [1] and the
talk:Fundraising [2]) and we expect to post further answers to those
talkpages during the US West Coast daytime today.
--
*Julia Brungs*
Senior Community Relations Specialist
Wikimedia Foundation
https://wikimediafoundation.org/
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 4:01 PM Andreas Kolbe
jayen466@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Lisa and all,
>
> Could you provide any update on what is happening with the $8.7 million in
> the Tides Advocacy fund? I asked about it on the Endowment talk page on
> Meta two weeks ago, and while many other questions there have been
> answered, this one has not.
>
> I also asked on Meta how much money the WMF had contributed to the
> Endowment to date. Amy Parker just replied it had been $20 million,[1] but
> that can't be right, as in the audited 2019/2020 financial statements
> published last year (page no. 14), it was already $25 million ($5 million
> p.a. over five years).[2]
>
> A curious side-effect of the Endowment is that money the WMF pays into its
> own Endowment shows up as an Awards and Grants *expense* in the audited
> statements, reducing the revenue surplus. Money flowing into the Endowment,
> on the other hand, is included neither in Revenue nor Net Assets, as it is
> legally separate.[7]
>
> So according to the financial statements for the last five years, the WMF
> had a revenue surplus of over $100 million over that time period (measured
> as increase in net assets, from $77.8 million to $180.3 million). But over
> the same period, the Foundation also accumulated $100 million in Tides
> Foundation funds (i.e. the Endowment, reported[6] to have passed $90
> million in early February, and the $8.7 million in Tides Advocacy).
>
> This means that the Foundation has actually had a revenue surplus of more
> than $200 million over the past five years, averaging over $40 million per
> annum.
>
> Could you provide an update on exactly how much many money is in the
> Endowment and the Tides Advocacy fund at the moment? The Endowment is not
> very transparent. I understand the only page showing how much money has
> accumulated in the Endowment is the page on Meta, and this has only
> sporadically been updated. In this edit,[3] for example, it jumped from
> $62.9 million to $90 million. Before that, the total had last been updated
> more than six months prior.[4]
>
> Would it be possible to provide, say, monthly updates for the Endowment on
> Meta? (If I have missed any other pages or documents containing such
> information, I would ask you to kindly provide a link.)
>
> In the discussions on Meta, Pats Peña pointed me to the FAQ[5] for the
> most recent financial statements. One thing I miss in these FAQs is any
> reference to the $100 million held by the Tides Foundation. Readers of the
> FAQ will remain unaware that the actual amount of investments the WMF was
> the beneficiary of in July 2020 substantially exceeded the figure of $170
> million given in the audited financial statements the FAQ refers to –
> including the Tides funds, by well over $70 million when the FAQ was
> published.
>
> I also cannot see any reference to the fact that the expenses noted in the
> FAQ include $5 million that the WMF paid into its own endowment. Could this
> be remedied in this and future FAQs?
>
> Finally, if we were trying to provide a best estimate of the Wikimedia
> Foundation's current total net assets (last reported as $180 million,
> excluding money in the Tides Foundation), would $200 million be in the
> right ballpark, for a grand total of $300 million if we include the Tides
> Foundation money?
>
> I understand that fundraising this fiscal year already exceeded the
> combined year goal for the Foundation and endowment after the first six
> months, followed by the year goal being raised, and exceeded again before
> the end of the second quarter.[8] As fundraising continues (currently in
> Mexico, I understand), it seems certain the WMF net assets are once again
> likely to have risen substantially by the end of the fiscal year,
> especially given that once again, many physical events will have had to be
> cancelled owing to the pandemic.
>
> Best wishes,
> Andreas
>
> [1]
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wikimedia_Endowment&di...
> [2]
>
https://foundation.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Wikimedia_Foundation...
> [3]
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Endowment&diff=21...
> [4]
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Endowment&diff=pr...
> [5]
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Foundation_reports/Fi...
> [6]
>
https://www.axios.com/exclusive-the-end-of-the-maher-era-at-wikipedia-c1ed14...
> [7]
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wikimedia_Endowment&di...
> [8]
>
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/15/Wikimedia_Foundation_sec...
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 5:54 PM Lisa Gruwell
lgruwell@wikimedia.org
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Thanks for the questions. We intend to announce the Knowledge Equity Fund
>> in early 2021, once we have a bit more details and specifics worked out.
>> However, we can share the overall intention today.
>>
>> Some background: Our fiscal year runs from July through June, which means
>> that the second half of last year was heavily affected by the unforeseen
>> effects of the Covid-19 pandemic. Community events were canceled, hiring
>> slowed, and we put work on pause while we responded to the changing
>> circumstances. As a result, we ended the year with funds that were
>> underspent, relative to what we had planned for the budget.
>>
>> In May of last year, we were also planning for this current fiscal year
>> and had very little insight about how fundraising would perform in this
>> pandemic. People around the world were losing their sources of income, as
>> unemployment soared. We worked with the board to plan for different
>> scenarios, including if fundraising went really poorly.
>>
>> As a general matter, when the budget is underspent, any remainder goes
>> into the reserve. For accounting purposes, it cannot be carried over into
>> the budget of a new fiscal year. Because we were concerned about the
>> uncertainty of fundraising this year, we decided to set aside underspent
>> funds from the past fiscal year, so that we could keep our commitment to
>> our grantees even if fundraising fell short and also make progress on
>> knowledge equity. (Good news: Fundraising ended up going a lot better than
>> we expected when we were planning in the early months of this pandemic.
>> More to come on that.)
>>
>> With the WMF board’s approval, we set up a US$8.7 million grantmaking
>> fund at Tides Advocacy, which has two purposes: 1) Funding Annual Plan
>> Grants (APG) to the affiliates this year and 2) Funding Knowledge Equity.
>> We have been working with Tides since 2016 when we launched the Endowment.
>> The relationship has gone well and they have a lot of expertise at
>> administering grants internationally.
>>
>> Our first priority was to ensure that we had enough funding to support
>> community grants. We transferred the full amount for Annual Plan Grants
>> (APG) for FY20-21 over to Tides to ensure that all funding for
>> affiliates for this year was secured, regardless of how fundraising
>> performed. It also gives staff at affiliates and the Foundation more time
>> to work together to make thoughtful grants, instead of an end-of-year rush.
>> All affiliates who will be receiving funding through Tides were informed of
>> the arrangement last summer. All other grantmaking (Community Grants,
>> Rapid Grants, Project Grants) are still being funded through WMF directly,
>> as usual. There is a round of APG grants set to go out via Tides this week.
>>
>> As the Audit Report FAQ states,[1] the remaining funds will be used to
>> launch the Wikimedia Knowledge Equity Fund. This new fund is in addition to
>> the existing grants that are already available for the communities
>> (Community Grants, Rapid Grants, Project Grants, and APGs) and does not
>> impact the amount of funds in those grant portfolios.
>>
>> Our goal is to use this fund to invest in new opportunities that
>> increase the availability of free knowledge for marginalized people and
>> counteract structural inequalities. Knowledge equity is a key pillar of the
>> 2030 movement strategy, and this investment will help us to address some of
>> the barriers preventing people from accessing and contributing to free
>> knowledge.
>>
>> As of now, this is a one-time commitment of approximately $4.5 million.
>> We are still working on the specific initial objectives of the fund and how
>> it will operate. As a pilot initiative, we’ll be learning and adapting as
>> we go.
>>
>> We’ll share more details in early 2021 about the Knowledge Equity Fund.
>> We are excited to see what progress we can make for knowledge equity with
>> this investment.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Lisa Gruwell
>>
>> [1]
>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_reports/Financial/Audit...
>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_reports/Financial/Audits/2019-2020_-_frequently_asked_questions/id#This_year%E2%80%99s_report_says_that_the_Wikimedia_Foundation_provided_an_unconditional_grant_of_$8.723_million_to_Tides_Advocacy_for_the_Wikimedia_Knowledge_Equity_Fund._What_is_the_Wikimedia_Knowledge_Equity_Fund?
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 12:35 PM Katherine Maher
kmaher@wikimedia.org
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> Happy Sunday from San Francisco -- we've seen the questions on this
>>> list, and we'll reply tomorrow when folks are back at work. Thanks for your
>>> understanding!
>>>
>>> Hope everyone is staying well and safe,
>>>
>>> Katherine
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 5:36 AM Isaac Olatunde
reachout2isaac@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I agree with Dan. A question about this should have been directed to
>>>> the WMF and allow them to respond prior to raising it here (if that's even
>>>> necessary in the first place.)
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Isaac
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, 13 Dec 2020, 14:30 Dan Garry (Deskana),
djgwiki@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It seems disingenous to describe it as "secret" given that it was
>>>>> willingly acknowledged in the the FAQ of the annual financial audit
>>>>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_reports/Financial/Audits/2019-2020_-_frequently_asked_questions/id#This_year%E2%80%99s_report_says_that_the_Wikimedia_Foundation_provided_an_unconditional_grant_of_$8.723_million_to_Tides_Advocacy_for_the_Wikimedia_Knowledge_Equity_Fund._What_is_the_Wikimedia_Knowledge_Equity_Fund?.
>>>>> The information provided in the FAQ is somewhat lacking, but these are not
>>>>> the actions of people trying to sweep it under the rug.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let us politely ask for more information without being unnecessarily
>>>>> alarmist.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 08:54, Yair Rand
yyairrand@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> According to the recent Independent Auditors' Report of the WMF [1],
>>>>>> at some point prior to the end of June 2020, an entity called the
>>>>>> "Wikimedia Knowledge Equity Fund" was established, and $8.723 million was
>>>>>> transferred to it by the WMF, in the form of an unconditional grant. The
>>>>>> Fund is "managed and controlled by Tides Advocacy" (a 501(c)(4) advocacy
>>>>>> nonprofit previously led by the WMF's current General Counsel/Board
>>>>>> Secretary, who served as CEO, Board Secretary, and Treasurer there).
>>>>>> Given that a Google search for "Wikimedia Knowledge Equity Fund" yields
>>>>>> zero results prior to the release of the report, it is clear that the WMF
>>>>>> kept this significant move completely secret for over five months, perhaps
>>>>>> over a year. The Report FAQ additionally emphasizes that the WMF "has no
>>>>>> right of return to the grant funds provided, with the exception of
>>>>>> unexpended funds."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The WMF unilaterally and secretly transferred nearly $9 million of
>>>>>> movement funds to an outside organization not recognized by the
>>>>>> Affiliations Committee. No mention of the grant was made in any Board
>>>>>> resolutions or minutes from the relevant time period. The amount was not
>>>>>> mentioned in the public annual plan, which set out rather less than this
>>>>>> amount for the entire grantmaking budget for the year. No application was
>>>>>> made through any of the various Wikimedia grants processes. No further
>>>>>> information has been provided on the administration of this new Fund, or on
>>>>>> the text of the grant agreement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am appalled.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Yair Rand
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/f/f7/Wikimedia_Foundation_...
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>>>>>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>>>>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>>>> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>>> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>>>>>>
mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>>>>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>>>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>>> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>>>>>
mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>>>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>>>>
mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Katherine Maher (she/her)
>>>
>>> CEO
>>>
>>> Wikimedia Foundation
https://wikimediafoundation.org/
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>>>
mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Lisa Seitz Gruwell
>>
>> Chief Advancement Officer
>>
>> Wikimedia Foundation
https://wikimediafoundation.org/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>>
mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>
mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
>