Gerard Meijssen wrote:
When you establish objective criteria, the point of them is that they are measurable. So when it is put to me if a project that conforms to the criteria may be closed, then yes the project may be closed. There are criteria why you would consider it. The problem is that at this moment there is a faction that is disgusted with projects that are only wasting time and effort and there is another faction that is disgusted because people have the audacity to propose the closure for projects.
Your idea to establish objective criteria relies on the assumptions that (a) our consideration of suitable criteria will remain the same over time, and (b) that we can establish objective criteria without looking at actual real-life examples of good or bad projects. I think both of these assumptions fail. I think objective criteria is the wrong path for this kind of decision. You're trying to draw a map of an unknown country, before you enter it.
In 2001 we had this new wiki toy and set it up in new languages. Klingon seemed to be as good an idea as German, Esperanto or French. Today we think differently. Early on in every project, we thought lots of little stubs was fun and great and better than nothing. Today we're cleaning up these stubs, merging them into larger units or completely removing them.
What remains constant over time, though, is that we should always ask ourselves: Do we have something here that we can be proud of, or would we do better without this part or that part? That's something we can ask and answer at every given time, rather than trying to establish objective criteria beforehand.
Lions don't hunt gazelles that run slower than any fixed speed X. They hunt the slowest running of the gazelles that are available.
So, I don't want admit that you're like a lion or that slow projects should be hunted down. But we should take an inventory and see how the poorly managed projects measure in comparison with others. I think inventory and measurement are more viable methods than trying to establish objective criteria in the blind.