Dear all,
thank you again for your answers so far. I would have had hoped to have more voices participating, but everyone who did agreed that it should be done.
If you want to state your opinion -- whether support or worry -- on setting HTTPS canonical for the Uzbek Wikipedia, please do so. I am sure it will support the Foundation in making the right decision.
All the best greetings.
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Anonymous User wikifriend2001@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Tim Starling tstarling@wikimedia.org wrote:
Is it enough to set the <link rel="canonical">, or is it also
necessary to redirect?
When I asked the nice folks at Google's search team, they answered me the following:
- The best answer would for them to use rel=canonical tags so that
http://example.wikimedia.uz points to http*s*://example.wikimedia.uz. So I'd send them this page: http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=139394 and tell them to start doing that. If they're very serious (and it's a small property, so there's not much risk) then they could make every http page 301 to the https version as well.
I don't know how much effort each of these two measures would be. If you'd ask me, I would suggest to be "very serious", but we are not under a deadline (the situation has been like this for more than a year now), and setting the rel="caonical" would already be really, really helpful.
Thank you all for your encouraging comments so far.