Dariusz Siedlecki a écrit :
2005/8/31, Jean-Baptiste Soufron jbsoufron@gmail.com:
Still, there are other projects using GFDL that would benefit from a correct - and clear - compatibility. Plus, we should not stick to your case only and I am certain that there are some wp contributors who would be happy to be able to re-use wn content.
Okay, I'll be bold - from a NPOV, the CC licenses are the best for us and GFDL in its current state is way below them. But there's one problem. Reusing content.
Still, note this - do we really want to attach 10 pages of GFDL license to our print edition? I think a simple "Licensed under CC-By-SA 2.5 (http://creativecommons.org/etc/etc)" would be okay - and this is exactly what a text licensed under CC needs.
Sure, but the CC licenses are not that clear ! Do you now what they mean when they say they are not "revokable" for example. We just talked about it for 2 hours on IRC yesterday.
The CC licenses were not meant to be used precisely for Wikinews and they don't adopt the exact vocabulary we need to describe what we do. We have a chance to make it perfect, so let's do it rather than to rely on third parties legal work.