On 5 September 2011 11:02, Marc A. Pelletier marc@uberbox.org wrote:
On 05/09/2011 10:55 AM, Andrew Gray wrote:
As to why no-one is distributing a "filtered" version of Wikipedia, I think that falls more under the general heading of "where are the major third-party reusers that anyone actually cares about?" - the non-existence of a commercial filtered version is less of a surprise when we consider the dearth of commercial packaged versions at all...
You'd think a "safe" version would be a valuable service that many would be willing to pay for, given the hordes of people beating down our doors demanding just that...
oh, wait.
They already exist, and have for years. We call them "mirrors.
Risker/Anne