Daniel Mayer wrote:
--- Angela beesley@gmail.com wrote:
I've made my position clear already - I think the process is fine and that you don't need any more input from the Board. If the rest of the Board decline to comment, I'd take that as silent approval. All members of the Board, if they're at all following what's going on here or in the state of the wiki reports which already explained this, are well aware of the accreditation scheme, and none have objected to it.
What is not clear is if those people who are accredited have permission to use the Wikinews name and logo on badges.
-- mav
Hoi, It may be not clear to you, but when a process is explicitly seen as a process that is owned by a project and implicitly endorsed by the board, how can it not be permitted to use the logo and badges of that project ? Who else is to determine how the paraphernalia of a project are to be used but the project itself ? Thanks, GerardM