Hoi, The thing you fail to understand is how much of what we do is done by a community. What we need is collaboration with the world of libraries. It is embodied by librarians and yes, it is important that they are on our side. To be on our side, they need to know Wikipedia, what we are doing in Wikidata with scholarly papers. They need to know, be involved in order to help their clients understand the Internet and Wikipedia. Their clients are or may become Wikimedians.
So yes, we are dabbling with AI to find where citations are most needed. We need to work on including science in Wikidata so that its references may be used in a scalable way. A way that allows us to check Wikipedia for the retractions we are finally including in Wikidata. The technology may become available to us but we need people who understand it, live it. Librarians are great at that. Thanks, GerardM
On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 at 19:37, Jennifer Pryor-Summers < jennifer.pryorsummers@gmail.com> wrote:
Jake
Thanks for that, but I think we need to preserve a sense of proportion here. According to a recent WMF Research finding, see
https://wikimediafoundation.org/2019/04/03/can-machine-learning-uncover-wiki... , https://wikimediafoundation.org/2019/04/03/can-machine-learning-uncover-wikipedias-missing-citation-needed-tags/, "one out of four articles in English Wikipedia does not have any references at all". That' something like 1.5 million articles, and maybe 3 million across all languages. Your report suggests that around 6000 articles were updated: that's at best 0.2% of the backlog. At this rate it will take about 250 years to clear it. Perhaps a new approach is needed -- WMF researchers are looking into AI.
JPS
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 6:27 PM Jake Orlowitz jorlowitz@gmail.com wrote:
Librarians and library lovers,
Next month from May 15th to June 5th we will be joining together around
the
world to make Wikipedia more reliable. You can participate in #1Lib1Ref
by
simply adding a citation to Wikipedia's content.
That's all we ask and imagine: a world in which every librarian (or archivist, reference professional, and scholar) adds 1 more reference to Wikipedia.
This is the fourth year of the #1Lib1Ref campaign and our second time running it in May, when it's more convenient for the southern hemisphere. You can learn about this year's January campaign too in our recently released learnings report.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/The_Wikipedia_Library/1Lib1Ref/Lessons/2019
Full resources and guides for participating in May are available on the http://1lib1ref.org campaign website.
The campaign will be fully tracked with daily metrics and leaderboard updates. You can make sure your contribution is counted by using the Program and Events Dashboard for your event, institution, or region.
Login to start a new event or join up with an existing group for the May Campaign here:
https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/campaigns/1lib1ref_may_2019/programs
Please tell your library and library-loving friends about #1Lib1Ref in May. We need everyone's help to make Wikipedia more reliable!
Sincerely,
Jake Orlowitz
Head of the Wikipedia Library
Wikimedia Foundation
wikipedialibrary@wikimedia.org
@Wikilibrary
P.S. Don’t worry if you can’t make it for the May campaign, as now
1Lib1Ref
receives annual support and you can always reach out for assistance any time of the year. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe