Hoi, The modern skin may be nice and clear, but it is not what we serve to our customers. When people test new functionality, it is tested against the ubiquitous monobook skin and I do know that some of the skins are broken with some of the later extensions. I do not have nor take the time for this.
I am used to monobook, it is functional for me, but the whole experience can be improved. I find it really funny that this is a website abour skin and that for me the best bit is its skin. Thanks, GerardM
On Feb 7, 2008 4:48 PM, Bryan Tong Minh bryan.tongminh@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 7, 2008 2:46 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
attractive package. It is easy to argue that without it they will not do well, it is as easy to argue that with a cleaner/less cluttered skin we would do better.
It has been said in the past that a new skin would be a good thing.
These
arguments are as good as ever. Thanks, GerardM
Have you looked at the modern skin? It is a nice clear skin.
Bryan
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l