Sorry if this is *too* condensed, but here is one summary of this issue...
First attempt at labeling content was made by Uwe Kils, and his class of students collectively logging as Vikings or something of the sort tagged content not suitable for teenst. Jimbo banned them, but an accomodation was made wherein they promised to not continue tagging articles.
Then we had "Toby" . Again, by acclamation, that was squashed. It was too ridiculous for words.
After that, numerous variations and formulations of filtering or tagging content have been floated, and have pretty much earned their status of the most perennial suggestion to always burn and crash.
And now we have a board/executive that wants to do an end run around all that nasty history and create a fact on the ground. No, I don't think that will fly., '