I've seen editors -- editors which I respect -- argue for example that if the terrorists beheading Iraqi hostages released Commons-licensed videos of their beheadings, these would be suitable additions to Commons and the biographies of the people concerned, per NOTCENSORED.
You might not see an NPOV violation in such an editorial decision, but I do (bearing in mind that UNDUE is part of NPOV, and dueness is established by weight in reliable sources).
Why we should be doing things that no other reliably published source out there does is beyond me.
Andreas
The problem is to make sound judgments with respect to what is to be censored based on some semblance of rationality. A preliminary consideration is whether there is actual information involved.
A beheading is best left to the imagination... But most of the beheading of Daniel Perl was shown on network television, only the actual cutting and bleeding was left out.
Fred
User:Fred Bauder