Hello,
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Mark Williamson node.ue@gmail.com wrote:
It's certainly possible (and I'm not saying this is what happened because I have absolutely no idea) that the articles were being developed by someone who interviewed people who work for the Foundation, and that person was forbidden to submit the articles, or told to remove some things.
In which case, it would be self-censorship, not censorship nor editorial control by the foundation.