It would be interesting to see how affiliates do make decision in this process as we have only 6 weeks(4 after the endorsements are finalised) from close of nominations to final voting
Wikimedia Australia has invited it members to consider the list of nominations and whether the community will endorse any candidates, once the nominations are finalised with a list of endorsed candidates members will again be asked to express an opinion on who to vote for, with the committee voting according to consensus.
On 11 March 2016 at 20:07, John Mark Vandenberg jayvdb@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Cristian Consonni kikkocristian@gmail.com wrote:
Il 11/Mar/2016 11:50, "Gordon Joly" gordon.joly@pobox.com ha scritto:
Do Chapters have to ask their membership, or are they empowered to vote without going back to the members?
Practices vary widely. Some chapters discuss how to vote in their
(annual)
general assemblies and they finally vote on who to vote. In other
chapters
it's the board that decides. In these cases usually there is a formal deliberation by the board and those are usually ratified by the members
in
the next general assembly.
Can we document this on meta? i.e. a table of which affiliates do what?
-- John Vandenberg
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe