On 1 September 2010 00:27, John Vandenberg jayvdb@gmail.com wrote:
You, and the RW article about WP, start from the assertion that Wikipedia is successful. Successful at what? Success at Google rankings/pageviews/popular culture? Is that the only appropriate measure of an encyclopedia; an encyclopedia which is putting other encyclopedia's out of business? What is it unsuccessful at? The RW article about WP does little to demonstrate a rational persons observation of WP. It reads like the writer(s) are drunk on coolaid.
This appears to be a very inefficacious way for you to edit the wiki page you're talking about.
- d.