+1 to what Geoffrey said.
Steven Walling
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Geoffrey Plourde geo.plrd@yahoo.comwrote:
I support the changes, its cleaned up my inbox and made the discussions I'm seeing more worthy of attention. The list is running better than ever.
From: Benjamin Lees emufarmers@gmail.com To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Tue, March 16, 2010 9:43:22 PM Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] How to kill a mailing list
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen < cimonavaro@gmail.com> wrote:
Anthony wrote:
August 2009: 1030 September 2009: 791 October 2009: 326 November 2009: 513 December 2009: 234 January 2010: 207 February 2010: 213 March 2010: ???
And your point.
Are you claiming credit?
Or are you claiming to be the victim?
The autopsy indicates that it was a suicide.
Presumably he feels that the way the list has been managed has contributed to its decline. I don't disagree in that regard. On the other hand, raw message counts can be misleading: are 200-message threads a good thing? _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l