It has been said already in different ways but since it appears not to be being followed. As much as i may disagree with some of what he said and the way he said it talking about Ottava on this list at the moment has become at best off-topic.
Continuing to talk about our concerns and problems about a user who is either on moderation or no longer subscribed to the list (and therefore much less likely to be either a current problem on the list or able to respond) is neither on-topic or to be honest fair. Neither of the two emails should have been sent in the first place and even ignoring that the conversation has gone on to long.
Let's end this.
James Alexander Jamesofur
On Sunday, June 27, 2010, Geoffrey Plourde wrote:
Now if we were to get into a pissing contest over the top organizers of Wikiversity, I would say the persons most likely to be considered founders would be John Schmidt, Cormac Lawler, and Robert Horning. Ottava does have a point that he is one of the most senior active custodians, since not that many of the custodians are active.
From: Thomas Dalton To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List Sent: Sun, June 27, 2010 5:55:48 AM Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Your abuse of moderator status
On 26 June 2010 14:44, Andre Engels wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Jeffrey Peters 17peters@cardinalmail.cua.edu wrote:
Austin,
Maybe you didn't realize but I am the top organizer of Wikiversity.
Wikiversity has a "top organizer"? What does that mean?
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l