On Dec 3, 2007 1:48 PM, George Herbert george.herbert@gmail.com wrote:
Where do you stand on the question of commercial Wikipedia mirror sites having non-GFDL content on pages, such as ads and any additional information they may chose to create and release?
What's so different from that (existing, well accepted) practice and letting someone take your illustration and use it in a book?
If you want NC, then you should say so, but it's not consistent with how we use GFDL on the project now...
If the GFDL could reach as far as forcing mirror sites to use GFDL-licensed ads, that'd be fine with me, and I don't want NC.