On Thursday 08 May 2008 06:11:31 Aphaia wrote:
Thanks for your information but it doesn't sound an "interwiki" thing at all. It sounds rather trwiki internal issue and that's all.
And I would add using stewards as deus ex machina to judge community issues is a horrible idea, at least for me. Trwiki, in this case, would be better to settle their own arbcom; again it doesn't look like "interwiki" things.
This was and interwiki issue because crosswiki CU action was needed (including CU action at tr.wp by steward because of limited amount of time and long CU procedure at tr.wp).
BTW, Turkic languages are generally mutually understandable; especially Turkish and Azerbaijani. And projects in Turkic languages projects are good example for possible crosswiki block by default: a person which showed disruptive behavior at one of those projects will be disruptive on all other from that language group.
I would also like to see some wikis to implement long term blocks decided by en.wp ArbCom (maybe by other ArbComs, too; but I am introduced only in en.wp ArbCom work). While en.wp ArbCom decisions related to desysoping or operative decisions for some set of articles or similar may be questionable -- I don't have any doubt about their decisions about long term blocks. And it would make dealing with projects disruption easier.