I've been seeing the discussion on the APG proposal for the past one month. Concerns and comments from community members, Wikimedians from and beyond India indicates that the actions of CIS in the past and what they says in the proposal to do in future, have raised serious concerns among Wikimedians and those involved with the movement. Those who are not yet aware of this, please look over the situation and help take the issue in proper way.
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Hari Prasad Nadig mail@hpnadig.net wrote:
Fellow Wikimedians,
There were several concerns raised about the CIS India's APG Proposal here:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants_talk:APG/Proposals/2013-2014_round2/T...
Despite those, the FDC process seems to be moving on, with apparently the staff assessment not taking the comments from the community into account seriously. My concerns about this are stated here:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants_talk:APG/Proposals/2013-2014_round2/T...
Kindly participate in the discussion and help steer this in the right direction.
Thank you,
Hari Prasad Nadig http://hpnadig.net Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpnadig FlickR: http://flickr.com/hpnadig Wikipedia: [[User:HPN]] _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe