I imagine that this is the email that Trillium is referring to, for those who are just joining us:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2016-February/082566.html
Whether he means that he supported her "dismissal" or supported her "resignation" is left to the reader.
Cheers, Craig
On 26 April 2016 at 10:49, Pete Forsyth peteforsyth@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Trillium Corsage <trillium2014@yandex.com
wrote:
Jimbo responded to arbitrator GorillaWarfare on this list, basically, "yes, I supported with sadness the decision to dismiss Lila."
Wait -- seriously??
I missed this piece until today. But if this is true, it is huge.
Lila's departure was publicly communicated as a resignation -- not as a "decision [by the board] to dismiss."
Jimmy Wales has been quite vocal about wanting to defer to the board on what should and should not be communicated.
In this instance, did he seriously acknowledge a vote that was kept private?
So...Jimmy Wales can share confidential information when it seems personally convenient to him, but can withhold it when it seems personally convenient to him -- is that the standard?
-Pete [[User:Peteforsyth]] _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe