Daniel Mayer wrote:
--- Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Now here is the rub, when you insist that all our articles need to provide sources, you will lose our stubs. You will make the composition of the content different. When you only consider only the English or the German language wikipedia you may be of the opinion that it has enough content. For projects that are in its infancy like the Swahili Wikipedia it would be a killer. It would be a killer because we do not have the vibrant community that we wish for it.
Smaller language versions of Wikipedia need to emphasize growth over quality, true. But larger language version (not projects! Wikipedia itself is a project) do not and would be greatly improved by requiring sources.
Source citations must eventually apply to all projects. It's just a matter of when or at what stage it is introduced.
It is indeed great to strive to be better than other encyclopaedias. There biggest achievement is in the relevancy that they had in the past. Encyclopaedias were the embodiment of knowledge. Many people grew up with them and acquired knowledge that way. Wikipedia is young and its relevancy is something that can only be judged in the future.
And yet many millions of people are using the larger language versions of Wikipedia as reference sources RIGHT NOW. We have a responsibility to do what we can to increase the chances of actually serving them accurate content. Creating a culture of sourcing material to good references in the larger language versions of Wikipedia will help a great deal in that regard.
A sourcing culture is good, but it must not become a culture of panic that requires every little bit to be sourced immediately.
Ec