As much as I'd **love** to see that, I think it would be a very bold step from the WMF, supporting a heroic BUT illegal operation as Sci-Hub, against a despicable BUT legal operation like Elsevier. If the WMF does want to be bold, this is a great battle to fight.
Aubrey
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
Is WMF or any other Wikimedia organization still engaged with them? If so, what's the plan to drop that toxic connection and support Sci-Hub, LibGen and similar projects? EFF did that two months ago [1].
[1] https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/12/what-if-elsevier-and-researchers-quit-...
-- Milos
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe