Good news indeed. Is there a way we can stop it from crashing in mid edit and giving unhelpful advice like get a faster computer or a faster connection? I would not mind waiting a little longer for it to finish the job. It would be helpful if there were a user setting which allows longer wait time for those of us who cannot get a faster computer or connection for economic or geographical reasons. Cheers, Peter
-----Original Message----- From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Danny Horn Sent: Wednesday, 23 August 2017 8:41 PM To: Wikimedia Mailing List Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] New beta feature: Syntax Highlighting!
Hi everyone,
I've got some good news -- wikitext syntax highlighting is live again, and I'm almost completely sure it's staying live. :) You can now enable it as a Beta feature on all LTR wikis.
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Danny Horn dhorn@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi Andy,
Thanks for sending your thoughts, that's the kind of feedback that we need. People can either write responses in this thread, or post it on the project's talk page: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Community_Tech/ Wikitext_editor_syntax_highlighting
We'll respond as comments come in, making bug fixes and then making a plan for changes as we see what people have to say. Thanks again.
Danny
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:07 PM Andy Mabbett andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 3 August 2017 at 23:21, Danny Horn dhorn@wikimedia.org wrote:
WMF's Community Tech team team is happy to announce that Wikitext Editor Syntax Highlighting has been released as a beta feature today on all LTR Wikimedia projects!
I'm all in favour of having syntax highlighting - I teach people to edit wikicode, and I find it helps them to learn it more quickly.
I've been using the syntax highlighting gadget en.Wikipedia:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Remember_the_dot/ Syntax_highlighter
for some time now. I've just disabled, it, and instead enabled the new beta feature.
My first impression is that it is lacking in contrast - it's far harder, now, to differentiate the various types of content. Indeed the colour pairs used (e.g. #8800CC vs. #AAAAB3) fail WCAG web accessibility guidelines for colour contrast.
I realise that choice of styling colours is a "bikeshed" matter, but contrast ratio is a quantifiable and objective accessibility issue.
Also, because the script does not load immediately, the larger headings cause the page to "dance" as the script kicks in.
What plans are there to either receive and act on feedback such as this, or to provide greater user-customisation options?
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
--- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com