Or AWB, though neither option provides the sort of efficiency that is needed tio deal easily with the sort of issues that Tomasz mentions.
Michael
Jeevan Jose mailto:jkadavoor@gmail.com 4 February 2015 12:01
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:VisualFileChange.js can be used for mass edits.
Jee _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe Tomasz Ganicz mailto:polimerek@gmail.com 4 February 2015 11:03 Well - regarding permission-commons ques the current problem with mass upload agreements is Common's regulation that ticket-templates has to be added by OTRS volunteers themselves, except, when you are using GLAM tool, but GLAM tool is tailored for really huge mass uploads as it requires lot of preliminary preparations. So, there is no good path for mid-size mass uploads - say from 10 till 100-500 files.
This is incredibly boring job to add 100 templates to 100 files. There are some semiautomatic tools for this - but it still requires small programming and/or direct personal assistance - with at least 2 clicks per file. So OTRS volunteers - when they see agreements for for example100 pictures - are avoiding this, becasue handing this means not only aswering for E-mail but also 100 boring edits...
I was addressing the issue on OTRS e-mail list, around a year ago, but the answer was, that this is not the problem. But in fact - whenever there is such semi-mass-upload agreement - you can observe that OTRS volunteers are avoiding answering them.
James Heilman mailto:jmh649@gmail.com 3 February 2015 04:52 OTRS does not even bother replying to the consents I send them. Thus the images I have received releases for get deleted. Going forwards I am simply uploading to En Wikipedia. Not ideal but not sure what the solution is.