On Feb 23, 2016 7:01 PM, "Dario Taraborelli" dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org wrote:
Brion,
there was a very constructive, heartfelt session on models of bottom-up open innovation at this year's WMF All Hands. You can find extensive notes from this session on the Office Wiki ("Embracing skunkworks") which I encourage you to read and that I'd love to share publicly in a more readable format at some point.
Awesome, I'll check it out and read up on the prior art. :) Looking forward to further discussion on these ideas once we have a chance to clean it up.
There are obvious tradeoffs between allowing more flexibility on the one hand and making sure we have a reasonable budget plan, accountability to donors and stakeholders and appropriate resource allocation on the other hand, but I believe this model would work much better than the current
one,
at least for projects that are not core initiatives.
*nod* I like the idea of an internal small grants-like system to provide some documentation, a little oversight, and help coordinate needed additional people/equipment/contracting budget on small projects with a shorter turnaround time than waiting for next year's annual budget.
-- brion
Skunkworks is what got us revision scoring, EventLogging, countless initiatives by TechOps and innovative MediaWiki extensions.
Dario
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Yuri Astrakhan yastrakhan@wikimedia.org wrote:
Does it make sense to have an "Incubator team" ("Bell Labs" if you
will),
whose core competency is to nurture small projects? When projects are mature and need to switch into maintenance mode, they move under the umbrella of a different team.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 5:06 AM, Brion Vibber bvibber@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Feb 23, 2016 5:52 PM, "Dan Andreescu" dandreescu@wikimedia.org
wrote:
but also, some projects that were not so useful, sure. But we
learn,
move
on, we're not the first group of people to make mistakes : )
Yep... High-tech organizations call it "failing fast".
-- Brion
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
--
*Dario Taraborelli *Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation wikimediafoundation.org • nitens.org • @readermeter http://twitter.com/readermeter _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe