On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Delirium wrote:
Perhaps we should make the disclaimers more prominent? There are plenty of possible ways people could be damaged other than libel---for example, someone could rely on a wholly made-up bit of medical advice.
Let us by all means make disclaimers more prominent. It is too late for the project not to be successful -- from a position of strength the community can afford to be more self-critical, and even to start generating our own harsh statistics on how [in]accurate or [un]referenced our content is.
More suited to wikipedia-l, since we're talking about that; re-adding it to the Cc: list.
--SJ