On 11/09/2007, Andre Engels andreengels@gmail.com wrote:
As just to show how impractical - there are 14 requirements for modified versions, of those 14:
- A is broken by Wikipedia (no different title is given)
- B is broken (author of the new version and authors of the previous
version are not given on what should reasonably be considered the title page)
I would dissagree.
- C is broken (wikipedia is mentioned on the 'title page', but not
being a formal entity can't be the publisher, that is, I guess, the WMF)
No WMF is a service provider. Publisher is the author.
- D is trivially adhered to (there are no copyright notices on
Wikipedia pages, so they are indeed kept)
- E is broken (the copyright notice as required by the GFDL is not shown)
See that notice at the end of the article
- F is broken only in a trivial way (the permission is shown, but not
after the copyright notices, since they aren't shown)
- G is trivially kept (there are no invariant sections and cover
texts, so they are kept as far as they exist)
- H is possibly adhered to (the issue is whether having a link is
sufficient to consider the GFDL is 'included')
- I is broken (our history does not include the title or the publisher
of the modified version)
Publisher is the author. Title is the version title.