On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Patricio Lorente patricio.lorente@gmail.com wrote:
I think you should read again the original email. The word "proposed" is never used there. The fourth paragraph says:
"For your reference, here is the updated 2013-2014 Round 1 proposal process schedule:", refering to the process schedule for actual proposals.
Perhaps you understood:
"For your reference, here is the updated 2013-2014 Round 1 proposed process schedule:", which means a completely different thing. The email was not intended to send a proposal, but an already fixed calendar, which, by the way, should not create panic on anyone because the deadlines are in fact being extended.
I hope is clearer now.
True, my bad. Thanks for clarification!