j
k
j a
j l
On 14 April 2017 at 11:38, Andy Mabbett andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
A far better (and less WP:BITEy) outcome would be to get then to
Pretty sure WP:BITE doesn't apply in the case of deliberate abuse for clear purposes of spamming.
- d.
Back to the thread
Back to the list