On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Todd Allen toddmallen@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Todd Allen toddmallen@gmail.com wrote:
{{sofixit}}, just like any area with NPOV/undue weight issues.
"The next day someone will fix it back." - Douglas Hofstadter
Such is the nature of this project. If no one ever did anything because of that possibility, no one would ever do anything at all.
Well, it's not just that it's possible, it's that I judge the probability to be very high.
Rather, many of us believe that it would be irresponsible to implement censorship on an uncensored, comprehensive educational project.
I have no problem with developing best practices, and certainly I don't think anyone will argue that we should host or retain porn or near-porn involving kids
Certainly some people will argue this. I believe that, fortunately, most of them are banned, though.
Uh...wow. One would hope so. I don't believe that's very common, though. Certainly no one I've heard arguing against censorship is in favor of that.
But a policy against porn or near-porn involving kids *is* censorship, is it not?