Is the copyright claim on the scroll or the image. I would expect the latter and they are perfectly entitled to claim copyright on the image, the issue is that in various countries it could be held true by the courts that it is in copyright, and in others it isn't. Truth in copyright claims is like truth in advertising. ;-)
Regards, Andrew
On 27 Sep 2011 at 0:57, emijrp wrote:
OMG ISRAEL IS OUT OF USA? REALLY?
Come on. The point here is that originality is a common requirement for claiming copyright.
2011/9/27 Anthony wikimail@inbox.org
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
On 09/26/11 12:27 PM, emijrp wrote:
If originals don't have copyright, how can The Israel Museum claim any copyright for scans which lack originality?[1]
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridgeman_Art_Library_v._Corel_Corp.
The cited case is a US case, and not necessarily binding in other
countries.
It's not even binding on other districts within the US.
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l