On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Alex mrzmanwiki@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Rohde wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:51 PM, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
<snip>
FAL and GFDL 1.2 only are not uploaded in large enough amounts that we cannot absorb the loss.
GPL and LGPL are more of a problem
</snip>
On Commons, counting how many times each template is used.
GFDL 1.2: 9000 GPL: 14000 LGPL: 7000 FAL: 17000
I'm not sure your instincts that FAL and GFDL-1.2 are easier to deal with are necessarily correct.
Does that include images dual-licensed under CC licenses? The dual-license template just includes both license templates in a fancy wrapper.
Yes. My approach was very low tech, just counting what links here from the template. No effort to sort dual licensing or anything else fancy.
-Robert Rohde