On 1/10/12 10:48 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Erik Moellererik@wikimedia.org wrote:
From the standpoint of creating a balanced, community-friendly campaign that's respectful and responsive, decentralizing decision-making about the shape of the campaign to the geographic level is IMO likely to do the opposite: It will create more pressure (because it's a more competitive environment) between fundraising entities to maximize revenue and push the limits, while reducing visibility of (and associated accountability for) specific choices like the above among the wider Wikimedia community.
Yes, very symptomatic of the organiosational malaise. Folks up on high just not giving up on the idea that they know best, and trying to finagle a way to make their way against a very solid community view.
To be perfectly honest we need to set red lines for the foundation, beyond which the community will not follow,but will fork, with the full force of the intent. Learn to listen, foundation, don't try to sell things. You aren't put into your positions to sell things to the community. You are their servants. Get it?
While I agree with that, "the chapters" are not equivalent to "the community", so I think some caution should maybe be exercised on all sides. If anything the chapters seem less representative, driven by smaller, more clique-ish groups. I'm not sure their use of money is better, either. My attempts to track down financial reports of the larger chapters to see what proportion of the money has gone towards actually improving the encyclopedia has not inspired confidence; the WMF both seems more transparent in its accounting, and more careful in making sure a large proportion of its spending goes directly into its charity work. The various chapters' nationalistic attempts to "own" various language encyclopedias, along with a bitter rush towards the money-trough, is also a bit unseemly, and doesn't seem to have much to do with "community" to me, unless you take a very bureaucratic view of community.
-Mark