2005/8/31, Jean-Baptiste Soufron jbsoufron@gmail.com:
Still, there are other projects using GFDL that would benefit from a correct - and clear - compatibility. Plus, we should not stick to your case only and I am certain that there are some wp contributors who would be happy to be able to re-use wn content.
Okay, I'll be bold - from a NPOV, the CC licenses are the best for us and GFDL in its current state is way below them. But there's one problem. Reusing content.
Still, note this - do we really want to attach 10 pages of GFDL license to our print edition? I think a simple "Licensed under CC-By-SA 2.5 (http://creativecommons.org/etc/etc)" would be okay - and this is exactly what a text licensed under CC needs.