Fred Bauder wrote:
On Jun 13, 2006, at 12:01 PM, Brion Vibber wrote:
Michael R. Irwin wrote:
A bigger stacked Board micromanaging the community will leave us in the future right where we are now.
I'm curious.
What can the board and management (whatever its structure) *do* that will be better?
What are examples of things a hypothetically ideal management would do *right* that the present management is not?
Deal with marshaling assets and legal resources to deal with defamation litigation. Tackle the problem of how to effectively avoid such litigation.
Fred
Good idea Fred!
That reminds me .....
1. Establish some sane policy on conflicts of interest between organization members internal responsibilities and external interests
2. Extract Jimbo from the appearance of the ability to abuse or mismanage the Wikimedia Foundation for personal gain.
regards, lazyquasar