As another data point, I joined the WMF last April and there was no non-disparagement clause in my employment agreement. I suspect that at some point someone realized it wasn't much good and dropped it from the standard agreement, but older employees like Oliver were never given an updated agreement to sign. I definitely think that should be fixed, but I'm sure you can imagine it's not HR's top priority right now.
*Neil P. Quinn* +1 (202) 656 3457
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Alex Monk krenair@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 March 2016 at 20:07, Antoine Musso hashar+wmf@free.fr wrote:
Volunteers (ie neither staff or contractors) might have to sign a NDA whenever they get privileged access. The process is on: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Volunteer_NDA
What I suspect is granting public read access to the NDA would also disclose the list of signer and that might be a problem for people using a pseudonym. But do not quote me on that.
As a member of the #WMF-NDA-Requests project in Phabricator I can view L2, but I can't see the signatures. The list of people who can is hidden in a Phabricator custom policy. There is a task upstream about making it possible to read custom policies.
On 13 March 2016 at 20:07, Antoine Musso hashar+wmf@free.fr wrote:
For access to the servers, there is another document. It is a mix of technical recommendations and again a remember about sensitive data. An example would be: https://www.debian.org/devel/dmup
I believe this one is accessible to anyone logged in: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/L3 _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe