On 06/25/2011 12:38 PM, Lodewijk wrote:
As you may remember, the report was very long, and even though I speeded through it, I did not notice it since I wouldn't ever expect it there :) The fact you published it before doesnt make arguments less valid though.
I think that the argument is valid as I didn't bother the list with not important issues from the meeting.
I do agree we need some procedure, I am just not sure this is the right one.
Just to be super clear: the board approved this procedure explicitely in a vote? (I can't find the resolution yet on foundationwiki)
Sj and Ting informed us that Board has agreed with the policy after the discussion.