On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, The Cunctator wrote:
On 12/5/05, Daniel Mayer maveric149@yahoo.com wrote:
For the record, I very strongly support this. This is due to the fact that almost all, not just most, new pages created by anons on the English Wikipedia are borderline to complete crap.
Do we have stats on that?
New, usable articles created by anons accounted for around 40% of all new articles. This ignores speedied articles, etc which might inflate the figure in favor of anon-creation.
Lots of them need wikification and start life as stubs; I wouldn't call that "crap".
SJ