With all due respect to its participants, I think this discussion has reached a plateau of usefulness. We've established that there are varying uses of the word "stalking" with similarly varying definitions. We've established what serious stalking looks like, and the effects it can have on our editors and our community. We've established that we are not dealing with this problem effectively, because of limitations in what we can with the tools available to us. The Foundation has been asked what resources it can lend to assist in this area - perhaps silence is the answer we can expect for the moment.
In order to prevent the traditional devolution of Foundation-l discussions into irrelevancies, the next step ought to be concrete suggestions regarding what we can actually do (if anything). If the Foundation can't establish procedures for handling serious events of stalking, can the community do so in its stead? What would these procedures look like? Is there enough community experience and interest for a Wikimedia Stalking Action Group? Clearly the dispersed and disorganized attempts to deal with stalking in the past have been inadequate - can that be overcome with increased centralisation and organization?
Questions that need to be answered, I think, in order to move this discussion forward.
Nathan