I wrote:
Apart from the name (which the MediaWiki developers inexplicably refused to change), the bad image list is entirely compliant with the principle of neutrality (barring abuse by a particular project, which I haven't observed).
MZMcBride replied:
Not inexplicably: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14281#c10
Actually, that's precisely what I had in mind. Maybe it's me, but I found Tim's response rather bewildering. It certainly isn't standard procedure to forgo an accurate description in favor of nebulous social commentary/parody, particularly when this proves controversial.
David Levy