By which I which I don't mean to say most literature is useless or a
fraud: it's not! But it's also not a 100% black or white picture. -- phoebe
The 'not perfect ' fallacy.
Peer reviewed literature is not perfect Wikipedia is not perfect Ergo, Wikipedia is equally good as peer reviewed literature
You can see that's not valid, right?
All I can say is that from my experience of my limited area of expertise, Wikipedia articles on the subject fall far short of what you would find elsewhere (e.g. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).
E