On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 5:46 PM, svetlana svetlana@fastmail.com.au wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, at 23:42, Romaine Wiki wrote:
That the community reacts the way it does now, is because they care very much about the site and they notice something is terrible going wrong on WMF side and too less is done to fix those problems/issues!
if the community was not so willing to use force (ie a js hack) against the other party
"Using force" could equally well apply to implementing a feature without sufficient buy-in, and then refusing to roll it back when so requested.
The WMF's basis for concluding that readers are better served with the MV than without it is riddled with holes, as exhaustively explained elsewhere.
You talk about admin accountability, Svetlana -- but what about accountability for the WMF, when it makes sweeping changes that (among other things) remove any suggestion of an "edit" functionality from "the encyclopedia anyone can edit" from millions and millions of pages?
Pete [[User:Peteforsyth]]