Hi all -
I was invited to the meeting Bill refers to, but unfortunately unable to attend. I've talked to a number of the participants though, and would like to stress that this is, well, er, not a joke. The PR-side people involved in this are sincere in what they state, and I genuinely believe that this is probably the best opportunity we've had to establish a working relationship with the PR industry that preserves the integrity of our encyclopedia while avoiding stuff like Bell Pottinger, Wiki-PR, and all the low level constant PR manipulation that occurs throughout our sites that we've ever been presented with.
Best, Kevin Gorman
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:35 AM, William Beutler williambeutler@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, everybody. Longtime lurker, first time writing to the list—the first in a few years at least.
You may have seen some news coverage today about an initiative from a group of public relations, marketing, and communications agencies offering a statement, posted as a user essay on Wikipedia, stating in a public way their intention to follow Wikipedia's rules—especially regarding WP:COI—to educate themselves more about Wikipedia, and educate their colleagues and clients in turn.
- Here's the statement on Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Statement_on_Wikipedia_from_particip...
- Here's a good treatment of the subject from PR Week:
http://www.prweek.com/article/1297798/pr-firms-outline-wikipedia-compliance-...
- Here's a good blog post from Phil Gomes (User:Philgomes) about his
agency's participation in it: http://www.edelman.com/post/todays-multi-agency-wikipedia-statement/
This is a project I've led for a few months now, following a meeting in DC in February, bringing together a number of big agency representatives with individuals from the Wikipedia community, and some with academic backgrounds. These included User:Ocaasi, User:Harej, and User:Fuzheado. Some who watch this list may well have been invited as well, and while I'd love to have had a bigger group, the conversation that day was very good, and has led us to this point.
We're also very mindful that this was only one step—as User:Pigsonthewing has reminded me, not the first such step—but I think it could be a good one. U.S. agencies going on the record as pledging to follow Wikipedia's rules is a new thing, and we hope can renew this conversation.
Following this message you'll find the statement in full, and a list of all agencies (and other organizations) signed to it, as well as names + usernames of the representative from each.
Cheers, Bill (User:WWB / User:WWB Too)
+++
*Statement on Wikipedia from participating communications firms*
On behalf of our firms, we recognize Wikipedia's unique and important role as a public knowledge resource. We also acknowledge that the prior actions of some in our industry have led to a challenging relationship with the community of Wikipedia editors.
Our firms believe that it is in the best interest of our industry, and Wikipedia users at large, that Wikipedia fulfill its mission of developing an accurate and objective online encyclopedia. Therefore, it is wise for communications professionals to follow Wikipedia policies as part of ethical engagement practices.
We therefore publicly state and commit, on behalf of our respective firms, to the best of our ability, to abide by the following principles:
- To seek to better understand the fundamental principles guiding
Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects.
- To act in accordance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines,
particularly those related to "conflict of interest."
- To abide by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use.
- To the extent we become aware of potential violations of Wikipedia
policies by our respective firms, to investigate the matter and seek corrective action, as appropriate and consistent with our policies.
- Beyond our own firms, to take steps to publicize our views and counsel
our clients and peers to conduct themselves accordingly.
- We also seek opportunities for a productive and transparent dialogue
with Wikipedia editors, inasmuch as we can provide accurate, up-to-date, and verifiable information that helps Wikipedia better achieve its goals.
A significant improvement in relations between our two communities may not occur quickly or easily, but it is our intention to do what we can to create a long-term positive change and contribute toward Wikipedia's continued success.
*Participating agencies*
- Beutler Ink (William Beutler, User:WWB + User:WWB Too)
- Ogilvy & Mather (Marshall Manson, User:Tmmanson)
- FleishmanHillard (Sam Huxley, User:SamHuxleyFH)
- Peppercomm (Sam Ford, User:Leumas712)
- Burson-Marsteller (Patrick Kerley, User:Patrick at Burson)
- Ketchum (Tim Weinheimer)
- Porter Novelli (Dave Coustan, User:Extraface)
- Voce Communications (Dave Coustan, User:Extraface)
- Edelman (Phil Gomes, User:Philgomes)
- Allison+Partners (Jeremy Rosenberg, User:Jeremy at A+P)
- Glover Park Group, (Brian Gluckman, User:Bgluckman)
*Other participating organizations*
- MDC Partners (Michael Bassik, User:Mbassik)
- Chartered Institute of Public Relations, (Andrew Ross,
User:Andrew_ross_ajmross) _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe