--- Darko Bulatovic mail@itam.ws wrote:
Birgitte SB wrote:
--- geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/2/06, Darko Bulatovic mail@itam.ws wrote:
Today when war is over and we know everything
what
happen and we did go
peacefully for our freedom, you make you self
blind and you talk me
about working under Serbian wikipedia?
No not the Serbian wikipedia. En is not the
English
wikipedia it is the English language wikipedia. Just because
there
was once a country called England does not mean that the wikipedia belongs to that country. Instead wikipedias are divided by
language.
In this case the correct name for the language would probably be Serbo-Croatian.
This right here is the key the whole thread. Wikipedia sub-domains are seperated by written languages not nations. The goal should be to have
the
least amount of subdomains possible to concetrate reasources. When in doubt we should not create a subdomain.
The question I have is are we going to examine all current (or at least inactive) subdomains in the
near
future for merging possibilities?
Birgitte SB
Birgittee,
Dont put words in my mouth, it is rude thing to do. As this is not key it is just one fact in the history of Balkan. And Balkan is not UK. And this comparison just shows that you don't have a clue what you talk about.
Darko Bulatovic
_
I don't understand how I put words in you mouth. What I wrote about this being the key is my own opinion. I and I do believe basing languages subdomains off mutually intelligable written languages is the key.
Birgitte SB
____________________________________________________________________________________ Have a burning question? Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know.