On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 11:59:05PM +0100, WereSpielChequers wrote:
Hi Kim,
For example you still use the word censorship when talking about the image filter, now to me censorship is about somebody deciding for someone else what they can or can't see or hear. As long as the image filter is about enabling me to make choices about what I see then I don't consider that as censorship, and I'm happy for others to also have that choice.
If you actually read what I write, you'll see that I don't actually use the term censorship when refering to the image filter at all.
- There's nothing wrong with the filter program itself
Ok, so you actually literally just quoted me saying that. I know you can do a lot better, I've seen it! :-) Please try!
I would hope that the developers will now be told to try and write something that finesses as much as possible of the feedback.
I think we should definitely consult with the community a bit more, and do so properly.
There are multiple fork-risks if the foundation pushes forward, rightly or wrongly.
sincerely, Kim Bruning