The list is excellent. The only mile-wide glaring omission from it that I can think of, is Sunir Shah. What happened? Was he asked and refused a position on the advisory board?
On 1/28/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/01/07, Florence Devouard anthere@anthere.org wrote:
As decided last august, we set up an advisory group according to resolution http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Advisory_board You'll find the entire list here: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Advisory_Board
Excellent selections!
What sort of thing would we bug them with, through what channel?
I'm wondering on the issue of setting up an "editorial concerns" channel for English Wikipedia, our vastly successful and troublesome child. Mathias Schindler floated the idea after the Microsoft press in the past few days and I repeated the suggestion on Friday.
I can't say I'm having great success or a wave of people going "Hell yes, that's a great idea! I'll volunteer to help monitor that!" Evidently I'm just not using something that the cats think is tuna. HELP NEEDED.
Having an editorial concerns channel is I think an obviously nice idea; how to deal with the likely flood of crap^Wless valid concerns and the lack of a wave of volunteers going "hell yes, I'll watch it" is another matter. How would this remarkable selection of social website experts suggest we attract and keep the volunteers for it? I'm at a loss.
- d.
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l