On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 6:04 PM, private musings thepmaccount@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
On Wikipedia Review, 'tarantino' pointed out that on WMF projects, self-identified minors (in this case User:Juliancolton) are involved in routine maintenance stuff around sexually explicit images reasonably describable as porn (one example is 'Masturbating Amy.jpg').
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=27358&st=0&p=204846&a...
I think this is wrong on a number of levels - and I'd like to see better governance from the foundation in this area - I really feel that we need to talk about some child protection measures in some way - they're overdue.
I'd really like to see the advisory board take a look at this issue - is there a formal way of suggesting or requesting their thoughts, or could I just ask here for a board member or community member with the advisory board's ear to raise this with them.
best,
Peter, PM.
Wikipedia is not porn.
29 posts left.