On 6 December 2011 10:14, Bod Notbod bodnotbod@gmail.com wrote:
Hardly surprising or new, but something we need to be aware of: Wikipedia is being edited by a large lobbying company, Bell Pottinger. It removes negative coverage of its clients: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/caught-on-camera-top-lobbyists...
This appears itself to be churnalism. How's their actual editorial record look? Is there substance to these claims, or is this just bragging?
(I eagerly await WikiProject Press Agency NPOV, dedicated to reviewing every word written about any Bell Pottinger client ...)
- d.