I disagree. Under our licenses, we require attribution for content. If someone else takes my content and uses it without attribution, they are saying it is theirs. That is theft. They have taken my intellectual property, and claimed it as their own. That's entirely different than the RIAA line, which says "If you download copyrighted music without paying, that's theft". There is a HUGE difference between sharing copyrighted content inappropriately, and claiming ownership and authorship of that content. The latter is 100% unacceptable; the former at least has moral arguments against it. I certainly am not a drinker of the RIAA kool-aid, nor am I trying to equate it to criminal acts like larceny and the like. I am trying to put it into perspective however; it's not something we should be condoning or supporting. That's one of the benefits of having free content -- to minimize the instances of copyright infringement. It's hard to infringe on free content -- you have to actively try. So those who DO actively go out of their way to take credit for what our contributors have made, ought to be viewed in a stricter light precisely because of the freedom of our content.
-Dan
On 6/12/08, Brian McNeil brian.mcneil@wikinewsie.org wrote:
This is a tired old canard.
Copyright infringement is *NOT* theft.
When you infringe someone's copyright you have duplicated what they have, not taken it away from them.
For this very reason, the law views the two offences differently. If you equate copyright infringement with theft, you've been drinking the RIAA kool-aid.
Brian McNeil
-----Original Message----- From: foundation-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:foundation-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Dan Rosenthal Sent: 12 June 2008 15:19 To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Baidupedia copyvio collections
On 6/12/08, Henning Schlottmann h.schlottmann@gmx.net wrote:
Titan Deng wrote:
We Chinese Wikipedians are now collecting Baidupedia articles which
were
copied from Chinese Wikipedia.
What is all that copyright, lawyer, enforcement, loose face stuff about?
Last time I checked, Wikipedia was about disseminating free knowledge. Unfortunately the projects are blocked by the Chinese government, so people of the peoples republic have no access to our content, not the the parts that are deemed dangerous by the government, not to the other parts. Now someone takes at least some of the uncontroversial content and makes it available by copying into Baidu.
Of course it would be nice if they would acknowledge the license and give proper attribution. But they can't - Wikipedia is banned and they can't name this source.
But as our mission is to distribute our knowledge, I believe this is the second best way to distribute our articles, and the best available until the forces that are open up the Great Firewall.
Ciao Henning [[user:h-stt]]
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Free knowledge does not mean that the information itself is unrestricted, nor does it mean that the authors who make information free waive all of their rights. We fundamentally require attribution to our authors under our license. If Baidupedia is not respecting that, and are not in compliance with the other terms of the GFDL, then it is very difficult to say that they are working for the freedom of knowledge. Copyright infringement != free knowledge. It == theft. By enforcing that other websites respect the terms of the licenses our works are published under, we are actually furthering free knowledge by giving our contributors some assurances that their work will be protected and not abused. I know that I, for one, would have second thoughts about some of my contributions if I knew that it would be taken by another person and used under their name. That's not free dissemination, its theft.
-Dan
-- Dan Rosenthal _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l